Comparative Study of Condition Survey Investigation on Building Affected by Bridge Piling Installation

Asmawan Mohd Sarman; Nazaruddin Abdul Taha; Nur Farah Adlin Misri; Elis Mardzianah Mazlan; Muhammad Muizzuddin Mukhtar.

The building rating system enables the assessor to determine the performance of the building based on approved standards. This paper aims to evaluate the effect of the bridge piling installation on the surrounding building, assess the building condition by using approved standards and propose appropriate rehabilitation to the defects. In this study, the condition assessment of a residential building was performed using three (3) standards; CSP 1 Matrix, BARIS and QLASSIC 2006. There is a similarity between the concept of the CSP 1 Matrix and BARIS. However, BARIS has a more detailed score evaluation than CSP 1 Matrix. QLASSIC 2006 covers more specific components that can be evaluated according to Structural, Architectural, Mechanical and Electrical (M&E) and External Works. Based on the CSP 1 Matrix and BARIS analysis, the building is in Fair condition and requires attention for repair works. The data obtained from QLASSIC analysis is 17.44%. This percentage indicates that most of the elements do not comply with the standards from CIBD, and the performance of the building is poor. The causes of the defects are determined, and their respective rehabilitation is discussed. The effects of the Tebobon 3 Bridge construction on the surrounding building are analysed, and the finding shows that the bridge has no significant impact. The data assessed is before visual inspection basis. Hence, the scope of the study shall be expanded by conducting a Destructive Test (DT) and Non-Destructive Test (NDT) on the defects encountered by the building to determine the significance and their level of severity as well as verify the results from visual inspections. This study can also be widened to assess different categories of buildings by using a similar building rating system. So, using these methods, the quality and performance of other types of building categories can be assessed.

KEYWORDS: CSP 1 Matrix; BARIS; QLASSIC; Defects; Condition Assessment



Download this PDF file

REFERENCES

1. Alani, A. M., Petersen, A. K. & Chapman, K. G. 2001. Applications of The Developed Quantitative Model in Building Repair and Maintenance – Case Study. Facilities, 19(5/6), 215-221.
2. Che‐Ani, A. I., Tazilan, A. S., & Kosman, K. A. 2011. The development of a condition survey protocol matrix. Structural Survey, 29(1), 35-45.
3. Che-Ani, A.I., Ali, A.S., Tahir, M.M., Abdullah, N.A. G., & Tawil, N.M. 2010. The Development of a Condition Survey Protocol (CSP) 1 Matrix for Visual Building Inspection. The Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (COBRA2010). 2-3 September 2010. Dauphine Université, Paris.
4. Che-Ani, A. I., Ramly, A., Zain, M. F. M., Tawil, N. M. & Hashim, A. E. 2008a. Assessing the condition of traditional Khmer timber houses in Cambodia – A Priority Ranking Approach. Journal of Building Appraisal, 4(2), 87-102.
5. Che-Ani, A.I., Zaharim, A., Md-Darus, Z. & Tawil, N.M. 2008b. The formulation of evaluating timber defects as a tool for building survey. Proceedings of the World Scientific & Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) International Conference on Cultural Heritage & Tourism (CUHT), 22-24 July 2008. Heraklion, Greece.
6. Che-Ani, A. I., Zaharim, A. I., Zain, M. F. M., Tawil, N. M. & Surat, M. 2009. Timber defects in building: a study of Telapak Naning, Malacca, Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 5(1), 109-18.
7. Hairudin, A. R., Che-Ani, A. I., Hussain, A. H., Sarman, A. M. & Mazlan, E. M. 2020. The development of Visual Basic.NET application utilizing Condition Survey Protocol Matrix. TEST Engineering & Management, 83(May-June), 15053-15064.
8. Hollis, M. & Gibson, C. 2000. Surveying Buildings. 4th Edition. Coventry: RICS Books. Imprint.
9. Hoxley, M. 2002. Condition Inspections of Residential Property: A Procedural Framework. Structural Survey, 20(1), 31-35.
10. Ismail, I., Che-Ani, A. I., Tawil, N. M., Yahaya, H. & Abd-Razak, M. Z. 2012, Housing Problem of Newly Completed House: An Analysis Using Condition Survey Protocol (CSP) 1 Matrix. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66(2012), 960-963.
11. Mahmood, N. 2009. Building surveyors in private sector – condition assessment. Malaysia Building Surveyors Jamboree 2009. 4-6 December, 2009. Penang, Malaysia.
12. Mazlan, E. M., Che-Ani, A. I., Sarman, A. M., Mydin, M. A. O. & Usman, I. M. S. 2015. Common Defects On Floating Mosque: Tengku Tengah Zaharah Mosque, Kuala Ibai, Kuala Terengganu. Applied Mechanics And Materials, 747, 359-362.
13. Mazlan, E. M., Che-Ani, A. I., Sarman, A. M. & Tawil, N. M. 2017. Analisa Faktor Kecacatan Pada Usia Bangunan Masjid Terapung: Aplikasi Matriks CSP1. Journal of Design + Built, 1, 9-17.
14. PWD (Public Works Department). 2009. Garis Panduan Pemeriksaan dan Penilaian Keadaan Bangunan Sedia Ada (JKR 21602 - 0004 - 13). JKR 21602-. Bahagian Senggara Fasiliti Bangunan, Cawangan Kejuruteraan Senggara Ibu Pejabat JKR Malaysia.
15. RICS. 2009. RICS HomeBuyer Service 2009 – 3rd Edition Practice Notes. Residential Property Group of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). United Kingdom: Coventry.
16. Sarman, A. M., Che-Ani, A. I., Mazlan, E. M. & Yahya, F. 2018. Dome Structure in Coastal Area Condition Assessment Using Csp 1 Matric Application. International Journal of Advances in Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 5(2), 84-88.
17. Sarman, A. M., Mohd Nawi, M. N., Che-Ani, A. I. & Mazlan, E. M. 2015. Concrete Flat Roof Defects in Equatorial Climates. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(3), 7319-7324.
18. Uzarski, D. R. & Burley, L. A. 1997. Assessing Building Condition by the Use of Condition Indexes. Proceedings of Infrastructure Condition Assessment: Art, Science and Practice. August 25-27, 1997. Boston, Massachusetts, United States.