Located in the heart of Malaysia’s Coral Triangle – a region well-known for its outstanding marine biodiversity – are two Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), the Tun Sakaran Marine Park (TSMP) and Sipadan Island Park (SIP). The remote seascapes were both gazetted as an MPA in the same year, 2004, on widespread damaged coral reef ecosystems due mainly to the rampant use of prohibited fishing devices and unsustainable fishing practices targeting coral reef fishes. Our study was conducted in the TSMP, where active coral reef restoration and rehabilitation efforts using the coral frame method have been in place by the park management authority since 2011. The objectives of this study are 1) to determine the fish biodiversity and estimate the fish species abundance in TSMP, and 2) to determine the correlation between hard coral cover on coral frames and the diversity and abundance of reef fishes. Two coral reef restoration sites within TSMP were selected as the study stations. Underwater observations were made between July 2020 and January 2021, using Baited Remote Underwater Video Systems (BRUVS). Data on substrate type were obtained from photos taken by cameras placed adjacent to the deployed BRUVS, at the top of the coral frames. The photos were analysed to determine the types of substrate cover using the Coral Point Count with Excel Extension (CPCe) software. The results show a total of 3,208 individual fishes, identified into 146 species from 27 families. The three most abundant families, which make up just over half (52%) of the total abundance are Caesionidae, comprising 19.73% of the total composition, followed by Pomacentridae (16.05%) and Labridae (15.93%). Moon Wrasse, Thalassoma lunare is the most abundant species comprising 11.47% of the total abundance of fishes observed, while only four species of elasmobranchs, all batoids, were recorded. Notably, two of the four batoid species are listed as vulnerable in the IUCN Red List of threatened species. As for the type of substrate cover on the coral frame, a total of 2,750 points were categorized from 50 photos combined from both sites. Our results show that there are no significant differences (p>0.05) between hard coral cover on coral frames and the reef fish abundance, and between the percentage of hard coral cover on coral frames and the reef fish species at both sites. This is likely due to the low percentage of hard coral cover on the coral frames at both sites which is below 50%, with Site 2 exhibiting a slightly higher cover (37.96%) compared to Site 1 (27.70%). Despite the low percentage, it is noteworthy that the hard coral cover on the coral frames in both sites appears denser and structurally more complex than the adjacent depleted coral reefs. We conclude that active coral reef restoration and rehabilitation efforts are important in accelerating the re-colonization of damaged coral reefs by coral reef inhabitants, particularly by juvenile coral reef fishes. Lessons learned from this study may help park managers in refining coral reef restoration techniques of the damaged reefs.
Abelson, A., Reed, D. C., Edgar, G. J., Smith, C. S., Kendrick, G. A., Orth, R. J., Airoldi, L., Siliman, B., Beck, M. W., Krause, G. & Shashar, N. 2020. Challenges for restoration of coastal marine ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 544105.
Allen, G., Steene, R., Humann, P. & Deloach, N. 2005. Reef fish identification: tropical Pacific. Singapore: D2Print Pte Ltd.
Barbier, E. 2017. Marine ecosystem service. Current Biology, 27(11), R507–R510.
Bell, J. D. & Galzin, R. 1984. Influence of live coral cover on coral-reef fish communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 15(3), 265-274.
Bergbaur, M., & Kirschner, M. 2014. Diving and snorkelling guide to the tropical marine life of the Indo-Pacific Region. John Beaufoy Publishing Limited.
Charbonnel, E., Serre, C., Ruitton, S., Harmelin, J. G. & Jensen, A. 2002. Effects of increased habitat complexity on fish assemblages associated with large artificial reef units (French Mediterranean coast). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59(suppl.), S208-S213.
de Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L. & Hussain, S. 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50–61.
Debelius, H. 2007. Asia Pacific Reef Guide (3rd Ed.). Hollywood Import & Export, Inc.
Ebner, B., Clear, R., Godschalx, S. & Beitzel, M. 2008. Monitoring, In-stream Behaviour of Threatened Fish and Their Food Organisms Based on Remote Video. Aquatic Ecology, 569-576.
Ehrenfeucht, S. 2014. Artificial Coral Reefs as a Method of Coral Reef Fish Conservation. Honors Thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Elliff, C. I. & Silva, I. R. 2017. Coral reefs as the first line of defence: Shoreline protection in face of climate change. Marine Environmental Research, 127, 148–154.
Gallop, S. L., Young, I. R., Ranasinghe, R., Durrant, T. H. & Haigh, I. D. 2014. The large-scale influence of the Great Barrier Reef matrix on wave attenuation. Coral Reefs, 33(4), 1167–1178.
Gratwicke, B. & Speight, M. R. 2005. The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. Journal of fish biology, 66(3), 650-667.
Hackradt, C. W., Félix-Hackradt, F. C. & García-Charton, J. A. 2011. Influence of habitat structure on fish assemblage of an artificial reef in southern Brazil. Marine environmental research, 72(5), 235-247.
Hixon, M. A. & Beets, J. P. 1989. Shelter characteristics and Caribbean fish assemblages: experiments with artificial reefs. Bulletin of Marine Science, 44(2), 666-680.
Hodgson, G., Hill, J., Kiene, W., Maun, L., Mihaly, J., Liebeler, J., Shuman, C. & Torres, R. 2006. Reef Check Instruction Manual: A Guide to Reef Check Coral Reef Monitoring. California: Pacific Palisades. ISBN 0-9723051-1-4.
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W. & Dove, S. 2017. Coral reef ecosystems under climate change and ocean acidification. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 158.
Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D. R., Card, M., Connolly, S. R., Folke, C. & Lough, J. M. 2003. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301, 929–933.
Kohler, K. E. & Gill, S. M. 2006. Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): A Visual Basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Computers & Geosciences, 32(9), 1259-1269.
Komyakova, V., Munday, P. L. & Jones, G. P. 2013. The relative importance of coral cover, habitat complexity and diversity in determining the structure of reef fish communities. PloS one, 8(12), e83178.
Kyne, P., Dudgeon, C., Ishihara, H., Dudley, S. & White, W. 2016. Aetobatus ocellatus. The IUCNRed List of Threatened Species 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T42566169A42566212.en. Last accessed on 09 December 2023.
Lingo, M. E., & Szedlmayer, S. T. 2006. The influence of habitat complexity on reef fish communities in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 76(1), 71-80.
Loiseau, N., Kiszka, J. J., Bouveroux, T., Heithaus, M. R., Soria, M. & Chabanet, P. 2016. Using an unbaited stationary video system to investigate the behaviour and interactions of bull sharks Carcharhinus leucas under an aquaculture farm. African Journal of Marine Science, 38(1), 73-79.
Luckhurst, B. E. & Luckhurst, K. 1978. Analysis of the influence of substrate variables on coral reef fish communities. Marine Biology, 49(4), 317-323.
Maragos, J. E., Crosby, M. P. & Mcmanus, J. W. 1996. Coral reefs and biodiversity: A critical and threatened relationship. Oceanography, 9(1), 83–99.
McClanahan, T. R. & Arthur, R. 2001. The effect of marine reserves and habitat on populations of East African coral reef fishes. Ecological Applications, 11(2), 559-569.
Pauzi, A., Daud, A., Boni, A., Elvin, M. B., Mushidi, H. & M Sabry, S. 2018. Pemuliharaan Terumbu Karang Dengan Tukun Kerangka. Jabatan Perikanan Malaysia. Pp 1-46.
Reef Check Malaysia. 2018. Status of Coral Reefs in Malaysia, 2018 (https://www.globalgiving.org/pfil/37985/2018_RCM_Annual_Survey_Report__Status_of_Coral_Reefs_in_Malaysia.pdf). Last accessed on 09 December 2023.
Reef Check. 2022. Reef Check Malaysia Releases 2021 Annual Survey Report (https://www.reefcheck.org/reef-check-malaysia-releases-2021-annual-survey-report/). Last accessed on 09 December 2023.
Risk, M. J. 1972. Fish diversity on a coral reef in the Virgin Islands. Atoll Research Bulletin, 153, 1-4.
Rogers, J. S., Monismith, S. G., Koweek, D. A. & Dunbar, R. B. 2016. Wave dynamics of a Pacific Atoll with high frictional effects. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121(1), 350–367.
Sampson, M. A. 2020. Statistical Analysis in JASP A Guide for Students. doi: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9980744. Last accessed on 09 December 2023.
Semporna Island Project. 2001. Management Plan for the Semporna Island Park, Sabah, Malaysia. Marine Conservation Society and Sabah Parks.
Sherman, C. S., Chin, A., Heupel, M. R. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. 2018. Are we underestimating elasmobranch abundances on baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS) using traditional metrics? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 503, 80-85.
Sherman, C. S., Bin Ali, A., Bineesh, K. K., Derrick, D., Dharmadi, Fahmi, Fernando, D., Grant, I, Haque, A. B., Maung, A., Seyha, L., Tanay, D., Utzurrum, J. A. T., Vo, V. Q. & Yuneni, R. R. 2021. Pastinachus ater. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T70682232A124550583. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T70682232A124550583.en. Last accessed on 09 December 2023.
Sherman, R. L., Gilliam, D. S. & Spieler, R. E. 2002. Artificial reef design: void space, complexity, and attractants. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59(suppl.), S196-S200.
Wood, E., & Ng, J. V. 2014. Coral Frame Programme Tun Sakaran Marine Park. Progress Report 2014. Semporna Islands Project/Marine Conservation Society.
Woodhead, A. J., Hicks, C. C., Norström, A. V., Williams, G. J. & Graham, N. A. 2019. Coral reef ecosystem services in the Anthropocene. Functional Ecology, 33(6), 1023–1034.