Abstract and References
Transactions on Science and Technology Vol. 5, No. 2, 190 - 196, 2018

Morphometric Shape Analysis of Otolith from Selected Goby Fishes

Jocelyn O. Pattuinan, Cesar G. Demayo

Download this PDF file



ABSTRACT
Four selected fish otolith of Goby species, Glossogobius celebius, Glossogobius giuris, Awaous ocellaries, and Awaous melanocephalus were compared in this study using Elliptic Fourier SHAPE analysis. Kruskal-Wallis and Discriminant Function Analysis of shape data show significant differences in otolith shapes between species. The observed otolith shapes of the gobies provide a good taxonomic tool to separate the species of this genus. The diversity and complexity in otolith shapes may also be considered important for fisheries scientists, archeologists and for the discrimination of other species of this complex genus of fish.


KEYWORDS: Otolith, Morphometrics, Elliptic Fourier, SHAPE

REFERENCES

Blanco, G.J. 1956. “Assay of the Goby Fry (Ipon) Fisheries of the Laoag River and its Adjacent Marine Shores, Ilocos Norte Province.” Philippine Journal of Fish 4: 31–80.

Campana, S. E. & Casselman, J. M. (1993). Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 50(5), 1062 – 1083.

Campana, S. E. (2001). Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination including review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology, 59(2), 197–242.

Casselman, J.M. 1990. Growth and relative size of calcified structures of fish. Trans. Amer. Fish. Sot. 119: 673-688.

Castonguay, M., Simard P. and Gagnon P. 1991. Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 48:296-302.

Chilton, D.E. and Beamish R.J. 1982. Age determination methods for fishes studied by the groudfish program at the Pacific Biological Station. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 60 (1982), p. 102. Gulland, 1969.

Cuvier G. & Valenciennes A. (1836) Histoire Naturelle des Poisson [Natural History of Fishes]. Paris (France): Leurault.

Furlani D., Gales R., Pemberton D. (2007). Otoliths of Australian temperate fish: a photographic guide. CSIRO PUBLISHING, 216 pp.

Gauldie, R. W. (1988). Function, form and time-keeping properties of fish otoliths. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A, 91,395–402.

Gauldie R. W., Nelson D. G. A., 1988 Aragonite twinning and neuroprotein secretion are the cause of daily growth rings in fish otoliths. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 90:501–509.

Harkonen, T. (1986). Guide to the otoliths of the bony fishes of the Northeast Atlantic. Danbiu Aps. Denmark, 256 pp.

Herre, A.W. 1927. “Gobies of the Philippines and the China Sea.” Monographs of the Bureau of Science 23. Philippine Bureau of Science, Manila.

Hecht, T. (1987). A guide to the otoliths of Southern Ocean fishes. S Afr J Antarct Res,17,1–

Iwata H, Niikura S, Matsuura S, Takano Y, Ukai Y, 2000. Diallel analysis of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.)based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. BreedSci50:73-80.

IwataH. & Ukai, Y. (2002) SHAPE: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptorsJournal of Heredity, 93384-385

Kuhl, F. P., & Giardina, C. R. (1982). Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput. Graph. Image Process, 18, 236–258.

Lombarte A. and Castellón A. 1991. Interspecific and intraspecific otolith variability in the genus Merluccius as determined by image analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1991, 69(9): 2442-2449.

Lychakov D. V. & Rebane Y. T. (1993). Effect of otolith shape on directional sound perception in fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology, 28,531-536.

Lychakov, D. V. (1990). Comparative study of otoliths in some Black Sea fishes in relation to vestibular function. Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol 26,550–556.

Lychakov, D. V. (1992). Morphometric studies of fish otoliths in relation to vestibular function. ZhEvol Biokhim Fiziol, 28,531-539.

Manacop, P.R. 1953. “The Life History and Habits of the Goby, Sicyopterus extraneus Herre (Anga) Gobiidae, with an Account of the Goby-fry Fishery of Cagayan River, Oriental Misamis Province, Mindanao, Philippines.” Philippine Journal of Fisheries 2: 1–60.

Messieh, S.N., C. Macdougall, and R. Claytor 1989. Separation of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) stocks in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence using digitized otolith morphometrics and discriminant function analysis. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1647:1-22.

Morales-Nin, B. 2000. Review of the growth regulation processes of otolith daily increment formation. Fish. Res., 46:53-67.

Morrow J. E. (1979). Preliminary keys to otoliths of some adult fishes of the Gulf of Alaska, Bering Sea, and Beaufort Sea. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS Circ., 420, 32p.

Nolf, D. (1985). Otolithi Piscium. Handbook of Paleoichthyology (Vol. 10). Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer,  145 pp.

Platt, C. and Popper A.N. 1981. Structure and function in the ear. W.N. Tavolga, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.), Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes, Springer-Verlag, N.Y, pp. 3-38.

Popper A. N. & Coombs S. (1982). The morphology and evolution of the ear in actinopterygian fish. American Zoologist, 22,311-328.

Rohlf, F.J., & Archie, J.W. (1984). A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Systematic Biology 33(3), 302317.

Schmidt, W. 1969. The otoliths as a means for differentiation between species of fish of very similar appearance. Proc. Symp. Oceanog. Fish. Res. Trop. Atl. UNESCO, FAO, OAU. 393-396.

Smale, M. J., Watson, G. and Hecht, T. (1995). Otolith atlas of southern African Marine fishes. Ichthyological Monographs of the J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology 1, 1–232.

Stinton, F.C. 1975. Fish otoliths from the English Eocene. Palaeontograph. Soc. Monogr. (1975), pp.