The Contribution of Forest Ecosystem Services Toward the Local Community Living Vicinity to The Forest Protected Area: The Case of Kawang Forest Reserve, Sabah Malaysia
Guptah VG Nair, Andy Russel Mojiol, Kamlisa Uni Kamlun, Walter Lintangah
ABSTRACT
Kawang Forest Reserve covered an area of 1,551 ha, located in the eastern part of Sabah, Malaysia. The Kawang forest was gazetted as a forest reserve since 1957 and was reclassified in 2014 from Class III (Domestic Forest) to Class I (Protected Forest). The reclassification of the forest area is an effort to preserve the main function of the area to sustain the immense amount of biodiversity of the protected area. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the community perceptions’ on the contributions of Kawang Forest Reserve to support their livelihood. The ecosystem services that are provided by the forest are categorized into three main services namely provisioning, regulating, and cultural services. The study was conducted using structural administered questionnaires in a Likert scale (scale of 1.00 – very low to 5.00 - very high) settings. Local community living vicinity to Kawang Forest Reserve were selected as the research respondents using convenient sampling. A total of 102 respondents were selected from villages located around the forest reserve namely, Tanaki, Mook, Tampasak, Kaiduan, Bisuang and Bolotikon to assess their perceptions on the forest ecosystem services contributing to their livelihood development. The regulating services based on soil fertility and erosion control shows the highest value with an average of 4.58 min score, followed by the provisioning services based on the ‘source for clean water supply & filtration’ sub-services with a min score of 4.48 and cultural services based on ‘provides tourism area (interesting area, climbing, hiking and waterfall’ with an average min score of 4.42. Hence, the conservation of Kawang Forest Reserve is vital to support the welfare of the local community residing within the protected area as well contributing to a more sustainable forest management by the decision makers.
KEYWORDS: Forest ecosystem services, local community, Kawang forest reserve, conservation
REFERENCES
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J. & Sutherland, L. A. (2011). Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management, 32(4), 770-779.
Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y. & Mueller, F. (2014). Ecosystem services potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online, 34, 1 - 3.
Blanco-Canqui, H. & Lal, R. (2009). Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 28(3), 139-163.
Cong, L., Wu, B., Morrison, A. M., Shu, H. & Wang, M. (2014). Analysis of wildlife tourism experiences with endangered species: an exploratory study of encounters with giant pandas in Chengdu, China. Tourism Management, 40, 300–310.
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Turner, R. K. (1997). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152-158.
De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 41(3), 393-408.
Han, G., Fang, W. T. & Huang, Y. W. (2011). Classification and Influential Factors in the Perceived Tourism Impacts of Community Residents on Nature-based Destinations: China's Tiantangzhai Scenic Area. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 2010-2015.
Hilmi, M. A. & Mojiol, A. R. (2017). Contingent Valuation on Urban Trees in City of Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Transactions on Science and Technology, 4(2), 166 - 173.
Husain, S. (2010). Kajian Penggunaan Tumbuhan Ubat-Ubat oleh Etnik di Daerah Kota Marudu, Sabah.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lemelin, R. H. & Smale, B. (2006). Effect of environmental context on the experience of polar bear viewers in Churchill, Manitoba. Journal of Ecotourism, 5(3), 176–191.
MEA (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Island Press, Washington.
Mojiol, A. R, Zamri, Z., Hilmi, M. A. & Gitom, M. (2017). Visitors’ Willingness To Pay (WTP) at Kionsom Recreation Centre, Inanam, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Transactions on Science and Technology, 4(2), 174 - 182.
Mojiol, A. R., Tapuong, M. J., Lintangah, W., Apin, L. & Sompud, J. (2016). Conservation Awareness on Community Use Zone (CUZ) by Local Communities in Crocker Range Park, Sabah, Malaysia. Transactions on Science and Technology, 3(1-2), 85 - 92.
Pargan, N. (2009). Pengkelasan Hutan. Penilaian Sumbangan Hutan Simpan Kawang Kepada Penduduk Setempat di Daerah Kawang Papar, Sabah. 12-13.
Suardi, H., Awang Besar, N., Phua, M. H. & Mokhtar, M. (2016). Carbon Stock Estimation of Agroforestry System in Tawau, Sabah. Transactions on Science and Technology, 3(1), 25 - 30.
Thongsanit, P. & Imkarajang, W. (2015). Dust fall in the residential air environment of northern part of Thailand: Chiang Mai,Lampang and Phitsanulok province. Transactions on Science and Technology, 2(1), 74-79.
Tremblay, P. (2008). Wildlife in the landscape: a top end perspective on destination-level wildlife and tourism management. Journal of Ecotourism, 7, 179–196.
Download this PDF file